Agile vs Waterfall: Which is Better for Security Testing?

What are the main differences between Agile and Waterfall in security testing?

Agile focuses on iterative development and continuous testing, while Waterfall is a linear approach with distinct phases.

Which methodology is more effective for security testing?

Agile is often seen as more effective due to its flexibility and ability to adapt to changes quickly, enhancing security.

Can you give examples of security testing practices in both methodologies?

In Agile, practices like continuous integration and automated testing are common. In Waterfall, security testing is typically done at the end of the development cycle.

What are the challenges of using Agile for security testing?

Challenges include maintaining security standards during rapid iterations and ensuring all team members are aligned on security practices.