What are the differences between ARIA and native HTML elements?

What are the differences between ARIA and native HTML elements?

ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) provides additional accessibility features for web applications, while native HTML elements are inherently accessible. Native HTML elements come with built-in semantics and accessibility support, whereas ARIA roles and properties are used to enhance accessibility for custom components.

Can you give examples of when to use ARIA?

Sure! Use ARIA when you're creating custom widgets like sliders or modal dialogs that don't have native HTML equivalents. For instance, if you have a custom dropdown menu, you can use ARIA roles like 'combobox' and 'option' to make it accessible.

Are there any downsides to using ARIA?

Yes, over-reliance on ARIA can lead to accessibility issues if not implemented correctly. It's best to use native HTML elements whenever possible, as they are more reliable and widely supported by assistive technologies.

How can I test if my ARIA implementation is accessible?

You can use accessibility testing tools like Axe, WAVE, or Lighthouse to evaluate your ARIA implementation. Additionally, manual testing with screen readers can help ensure that your application is accessible.