ASP.NET Microservices vs Serverless: Which is Better?

What are the main differences between ASP.NET microservices and serverless architecture?

ASP.NET microservices are a way to build applications as a collection of loosely coupled services, while serverless architecture allows you to run code in response to events without managing servers. Microservices offer more control over the infrastructure, whereas serverless can reduce operational overhead.

When should I choose microservices over serverless?

Choose microservices when you need fine-grained control over your services, require complex transactions, or have a large team that can manage the infrastructure. Serverless is ideal for applications with variable workloads or when you want to minimize operational tasks.

What are the cost implications of using serverless compared to microservices?

Serverless can be more cost-effective for sporadic workloads since you only pay for what you use. In contrast, microservices may incur higher costs due to the need for dedicated servers and management, especially if the services are always running.

Can I use both architectures together?

Yes, you can use both architectures together. For example, you might have core services running as microservices while using serverless functions for specific tasks like data processing or handling webhooks.