Which is better for PostgreSQL: asyncpg or psycopg2?

I'm trying to decide between asyncpg and psycopg2 for my PostgreSQL project. Which one should I choose?

It depends on your project's requirements. asyncpg is designed for asynchronous programming and can offer better performance in I/O-bound applications, while psycopg2 is a mature, synchronous library that is widely used and well-documented.

What are the main advantages of using asyncpg?

asyncpg provides high performance due to its native support for asynchronous operations, which can significantly improve throughput in applications that handle many concurrent database connections.

Are there any downsides to using asyncpg?

One downside is that asyncpg requires an understanding of asynchronous programming, which can add complexity to your code. Additionally, it may not have as extensive documentation or community support as psycopg2.

Can I use both libraries in the same project?

Yes, you can use both libraries in the same project, but it may complicate your codebase. It's generally better to stick with one library for consistency.