What is the difference between git rebase and merge?

What is the difference between git rebase and merge?

Git rebase and merge are both used to integrate changes from one branch into another, but they do it differently. Merge creates a new commit that combines the changes, while rebase moves the entire branch to begin on the tip of another branch, rewriting history.

Can you explain when to use rebase instead of merge?

You should use rebase when you want to maintain a clean project history. It’s ideal for local changes before pushing to a shared repository. Merge is better for preserving the context of the branch history.

Are there any risks associated with using rebase?

Yes, rebasing can be risky if you’re not careful, especially with shared branches. It rewrites commit history, which can confuse collaborators if they have based their work on the original commits.

What are some best practices for using git rebase?

Some best practices include only rebasing local changes, avoiding rebasing public branches, and always making a backup before rebasing.