What are the performance implications of using smart pointers in C++11?

What are the performance implications of using smart pointers in C++11?

Smart pointers in C++11, like std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr, manage memory automatically, but they can introduce overhead.

Can you explain the difference in performance between std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr?

Sure! std::unique_ptr has minimal overhead since it doesn't require reference counting, while std::shared_ptr incurs extra costs for managing shared ownership.

Are there scenarios where using raw pointers is better than smart pointers?

Yes, in performance-critical sections where you need maximum speed and control, raw pointers can be more efficient.

How do smart pointers affect memory management in large applications?

Smart pointers help prevent memory leaks and dangling pointers, making memory management safer in large applications.