What are some common misconceptions about static typing?

What are some common misconceptions about static typing?

One common misconception is that static typing is always more error-proof than dynamic typing. While it can catch type errors at compile time, it doesn't guarantee that your code is free of logical errors.

Is static typing always better for large projects?

Not necessarily. While static typing can help manage complexity in large projects, it can also introduce overhead and reduce flexibility. The best choice depends on the specific project and team.

Does static typing make code harder to write?

It can initially seem that way, especially for beginners, as it requires more upfront definitions. However, many find that it leads to clearer and more maintainable code in the long run.

Are there languages that combine static and dynamic typing?

Yes, languages like TypeScript and Kotlin offer a blend of both static and dynamic typing, allowing developers to choose the best approach for their needs.