How do Pipenv and Poetry compare for Python package management?

How do Pipenv and Poetry compare for Python package management?

Pipenv and Poetry are both tools for managing Python packages, but they have different approaches. Pipenv focuses on creating a virtual environment and managing dependencies, while Poetry emphasizes dependency resolution and project management.

What are the main advantages of using Poetry over Pipenv?

Poetry offers better dependency resolution, a more user-friendly interface, and built-in support for publishing packages. It also uses a lock file to ensure consistent installations.

Are there any drawbacks to using Poetry?

Some users find Poetry's learning curve steeper than Pipenv's, and it may not integrate as seamlessly with some existing workflows.

Which one should I choose for a new project?

If you prioritize ease of use and quick setup, Pipenv might be better. However, if you need robust dependency management and plan to publish packages, Poetry is a strong choice.