Cost-Benefit Analysis: Serverless vs Traditional

What are the main differences between serverless and traditional architectures?

Serverless architectures allow you to run applications without managing servers, while traditional architectures require you to provision and manage servers.

What are the cost implications of choosing serverless over traditional?

Serverless can reduce costs by charging only for actual usage, while traditional models often involve fixed costs for server maintenance.

Are there any performance trade-offs with serverless?

Yes, serverless can introduce latency due to cold starts, but it can scale automatically to handle traffic spikes.

Which option is better for startups?

Serverless is often better for startups due to lower upfront costs and the ability to scale quickly without heavy infrastructure investment.