What are the cost differences between real-time and batch synchronization?

What are the cost differences between real-time and batch synchronization?

Real-time synchronization typically incurs higher costs due to constant data processing and infrastructure needs. In contrast, batch synchronization can be more cost-effective as it processes data in intervals.

Can you explain why real-time sync is more expensive?

Certainly! Real-time sync requires continuous monitoring and immediate processing, which demands more resources and can lead to higher operational costs.

Are there scenarios where batch sync is better?

Yes, batch sync is ideal for scenarios with large data volumes that don't require immediate updates, such as end-of-day reporting.

What about the impact on performance?

Real-time sync offers immediate data availability, enhancing performance for time-sensitive applications, while batch sync may introduce delays.

Which method is more commonly used in businesses?

It depends on the business needs. Many businesses use a combination of both methods to balance cost and performance.