Boost.Asio vs. libuv: Which is better for C++ async programming?

What are the main differences between Boost.Asio and libuv for asynchronous programming in C++?

Boost.Asio is a part of the Boost libraries and provides a higher-level abstraction for asynchronous I/O, while libuv is a lower-level library that focuses on cross-platform asynchronous I/O operations. Boost.Asio is more integrated with C++ features, whereas libuv is designed for performance and scalability.

Which one should I choose for a new project?

It depends on your project's requirements. If you need a rich set of features and prefer a more C++-oriented approach, Boost.Asio might be better. If you prioritize performance and need a lightweight solution, consider libuv.

Can you give examples of projects that use each library?

Sure! Boost.Asio is commonly used in applications like web servers and networked applications, while libuv is used in Node.js and other high-performance applications that require non-blocking I/O.

Are there any performance benchmarks available for both libraries?

Yes, there are several benchmarks available online that compare the performance of Boost.Asio and libuv. Generally, libuv tends to perform better in scenarios with high concurrency, but the results can vary based on specific use cases.