What are the differences between structural patterns?

What are the main differences between structural design patterns?

Structural design patterns are concerned with how classes and objects are composed to form larger structures. They focus on the composition of classes and objects to create flexible and efficient systems.

Can you give me examples of some structural patterns?

Sure! Some common structural patterns include Adapter, Composite, Proxy, and Bridge. Each serves a unique purpose in design.

How does the Adapter pattern work?

The Adapter pattern allows incompatible interfaces to work together. It acts as a bridge between two incompatible interfaces, enabling them to communicate.

What about the Composite pattern?

The Composite pattern lets you compose objects into tree structures to represent part-whole hierarchies. It allows clients to treat individual objects and compositions uniformly.

Are there any real-world applications of these patterns?

Yes, structural patterns are widely used in frameworks and libraries. For example, the Adapter pattern is often used in APIs to allow different systems to communicate.