What are the differences between systematic and narrative reviews?

What are the differences between systematic and narrative reviews?

Systematic reviews are structured and follow a rigorous methodology to synthesize research, while narrative reviews are more subjective and summarize existing literature without a strict protocol.

Can you explain the methodology used in systematic reviews?

Sure! Systematic reviews typically involve defining a clear research question, conducting a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies based on predefined criteria, and analyzing the data using statistical methods.

What are the advantages of using systematic reviews?

The advantages include reduced bias, comprehensive coverage of the literature, and the ability to provide strong evidence for clinical guidelines.

Are there any limitations to systematic reviews?

Yes, limitations can include publication bias, the quality of included studies, and the time and resources required to conduct them.