What are the differences in judicial review?

What are the differences in judicial review?

Judicial review refers to the power of courts to assess whether a law or government action is constitutional. The differences can vary by country, such as the scope of review, the standards applied, and the types of cases that can be reviewed.

Can you explain the scope of judicial review in the U.S.?

In the U.S., judicial review allows courts to invalidate laws and executive actions that conflict with the Constitution. This power was established in the landmark case Marbury v. Madison in 1803.

How does judicial review differ in the UK?

In the UK, judicial review is more limited. Courts can review the legality of decisions made by public bodies but cannot overturn primary legislation passed by Parliament.

What are the implications of these differences?

The implications include the extent of government accountability and the protection of individual rights. In countries with broader judicial review, courts can play a more active role in checking government power.