What is the difference between ethical absolutism and relativism?

What is the difference between ethical absolutism and relativism?

Ethical absolutism holds that there are universal moral principles that apply to all individuals, regardless of context. In contrast, ethical relativism suggests that moral standards are culturally bound and can vary from one society to another.

Can you give me examples of each?

Sure! An example of ethical absolutism is the belief that murder is always wrong, no matter the circumstances. An example of relativism might be a culture that permits certain practices that others find morally objectionable, like arranged marriages.

Which one is more widely accepted?

It varies by culture and context. In some societies, absolutism is more prevalent, while others lean towards relativism. Philosophical debates continue on this topic.

What are the implications of each viewpoint?

Ethical absolutism can lead to a more unified moral framework, but may ignore cultural differences. Relativism promotes tolerance but can lead to moral ambiguity.