What is the difference between ethical relativism and ethical absolutism?

What is the difference between ethical relativism and ethical absolutism?

Ethical relativism suggests that moral standards are culturally based and subjective, while ethical absolutism holds that there are universal moral principles that apply to all individuals, regardless of culture.

Can you give me examples of each?

Sure! An example of ethical relativism is the belief that practices like polygamy are acceptable in some cultures but not in others. In contrast, ethical absolutism might argue that practices like torture are universally wrong, regardless of cultural context.

What are the implications of each perspective?

Ethical relativism promotes tolerance and understanding of different cultures, but it can lead to moral ambiguity. Ethical absolutism, on the other hand, provides clear moral guidelines but may overlook cultural differences.

Which perspective is more widely accepted?

It varies by context. In academic philosophy, both perspectives are debated, but in practice, many people may lean towards relativism due to globalization and cultural exchange.