What is the difference between git rebase and git merge?

What is the difference between git rebase and git merge?

Git rebase and git merge are both used to integrate changes from one branch into another, but they do it differently. Rebase rewrites the commit history to create a linear progression, while merge creates a new commit that combines the histories of both branches.

When should I use rebase instead of merge?

You should use rebase when you want to maintain a clean, linear project history. It's particularly useful for feature branches before merging them into the main branch.

Are there any risks associated with using rebase?

Yes, rebasing can be risky if you're working on a shared branch. It rewrites history, which can confuse collaborators if they have already based their work on the original commits.

Can you give me an example of when to use merge?

You should use merge when you want to preserve the complete history of changes, especially in collaborative environments where multiple developers are working on the same branch.