What are the differences between iterative testing and waterfall methodologies?

What are the differences between iterative testing and waterfall methodologies?

Iterative testing involves repeated cycles of testing and feedback, while waterfall is a linear approach with distinct phases.

Can you explain the advantages of iterative testing?

Sure! Iterative testing allows for continuous improvement, quicker feedback, and adaptability to changes during the development process.

What are the main drawbacks of the waterfall model?

The main drawbacks include inflexibility to changes, late testing phases, and potential for higher costs if issues arise late in the process.

Which methodology is better for software development?

It depends on the project. Iterative testing is often better for projects with changing requirements, while waterfall suits well-defined projects.

Can you give examples of projects that use each methodology?

Certainly! Iterative testing is common in agile software development, while waterfall is often used in construction and manufacturing projects.