How do Loki and Fluentd compare for log management?

What are the main differences between Loki and Fluentd for log management?

Loki is designed for aggregating logs from various sources, while Fluentd is a data collector that can route logs to multiple destinations. Loki is more focused on log storage and querying, whereas Fluentd excels in log processing and transformation.

Which one is easier to set up and use?

Loki is generally easier to set up, especially if you're already using Grafana. Fluentd requires more configuration but offers greater flexibility in log processing.

Can I use them together?

Yes, you can use Fluentd to collect and process logs, then send them to Loki for storage and querying. This combination leverages the strengths of both tools.

What are some use cases for each?

Loki is great for monitoring applications in real-time, while Fluentd is ideal for complex log processing tasks, like transforming logs before sending them to a data store.