What are the security differences between low-code and traditional development?

What are the security differences between low-code and traditional development?

Low-code development often relies on pre-built components, which can introduce vulnerabilities if not properly vetted. Traditional development allows for more control over security measures but requires more expertise.

Can low-code platforms be secure enough for enterprise applications?

Yes, many low-code platforms implement robust security features, but it's crucial to evaluate their compliance with industry standards.

What are some common security risks in low-code development?

Common risks include inadequate access controls, reliance on third-party components, and potential for misconfigurations.

How can organizations mitigate security risks in low-code development?

Organizations can mitigate risks by conducting regular security audits, training users on best practices, and using secure coding guidelines.

Is traditional development more secure than low-code?

Traditional development can be more secure due to customizability, but it also depends on the developers' expertise and practices.