What are the pros and cons of manual vs automated code auditing?

What are the pros and cons of manual vs automated code auditing?

Manual code auditing allows for a deep understanding of the code, but it's time-consuming and prone to human error. Automated auditing is faster and can handle large codebases, but it may miss nuanced issues.

Can you give examples of when to use each method?

Sure! Use manual auditing for critical security reviews where context matters. Automated auditing is great for routine checks and large projects.

What tools are available for automated code auditing?

Some popular tools include SonarQube, ESLint, and Checkmarx. They help identify vulnerabilities and code quality issues.

How do I decide which method to use for my project?

Consider the project's size, complexity, and security requirements. A hybrid approach often works best.

Are there any best practices for manual code auditing?

Yes! Best practices include having a checklist, involving multiple reviewers, and focusing on high-risk areas of the code.