What are some effective methods for impact evaluation?

What are some effective methods for impact evaluation?

There are several methods for impact evaluation, including randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and mixed-method approaches. Each has its strengths and weaknesses depending on the context.

Can you explain randomized controlled trials?

Sure! Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involve randomly assigning participants to either a treatment group or a control group. This helps to isolate the effect of the intervention by controlling for other variables.

What are the advantages of using RCTs?

RCTs are considered the gold standard in impact evaluation because they minimize bias, allow for causal inferences, and provide robust evidence of an intervention's effectiveness.

Are there any limitations to RCTs?

Yes, RCTs can be expensive, time-consuming, and may not always be ethical or feasible, especially in real-world settings.

What other methods can I consider?

You might consider quasi-experimental designs, case studies, or participatory evaluation methods, depending on your specific needs and context.