Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: Which is Better for My Project?

What are the main differences between a monorepo and a multi-repo?

A monorepo is a single repository that contains multiple projects, while a multi-repo has separate repositories for each project. Monorepos simplify dependency management and code sharing, but can become large and complex. Multi-repos offer more isolation and can be easier to manage for smaller teams.

What are the advantages of using a monorepo?

Some advantages of a monorepo include easier code sharing, consistent tooling, and simplified dependency management. It also allows for atomic commits across projects, which can enhance collaboration.

Are there any downsides to using a monorepo?

Yes, potential downsides include increased complexity as the repository grows, longer build times, and challenges in managing access control for different teams.

When should I choose a multi-repo approach?

A multi-repo approach is ideal when projects are independent, require different lifecycles, or when teams prefer isolation for better access control and management.

Can you give examples of companies using monorepos?

Sure! Companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter use monorepos to manage their large codebases effectively.