What is the difference between moral absolutism and moral relativism?

What is the difference between moral absolutism and moral relativism?

Moral absolutism holds that there are universal moral principles that apply to all individuals, regardless of context. In contrast, moral relativism suggests that moral judgments are shaped by cultural, societal, or personal factors, meaning they can vary between different groups.

Can you give me examples of each?

Sure! An example of moral absolutism is the belief that killing is always wrong, regardless of circumstances. An example of moral relativism might be the view that practices like arranged marriages are acceptable in some cultures but not in others.

Which perspective is more valid?

The validity of each perspective often depends on individual beliefs and cultural contexts. Some argue that moral absolutism provides a clear ethical framework, while others believe that moral relativism allows for greater understanding and tolerance of diverse viewpoints.

How do these concepts affect real-world issues?

These concepts influence debates on human rights, laws, and social norms. For instance, discussions on issues like abortion or capital punishment can be heavily shaped by whether one leans towards absolutism or relativism.