What are the differences between routing attributes and conventional routing in MVC apps?

What are the differences between routing attributes and conventional routing in MVC apps?

Routing attributes allow you to define routes directly on your controller actions, making them more flexible and easier to manage. Conventional routing, on the other hand, relies on a predefined pattern to map URLs to actions.

Can you give me an example of how to use routing attributes?

Sure! In ASP.NET MVC, you can use the [Route] attribute above your action method like this:

[Route("products/{id}")]
public ActionResult Details(int id) {
    // Your code here
}

This maps the URL 'products/1' to the Details action.

What are the advantages of using routing attributes?

Routing attributes provide better control over your routes, allow for cleaner code, and make it easier to understand the routing logic at a glance. They also enable you to define routes that are more RESTful.

Are there any downsides to using routing attributes?

One downside is that it can lead to more cluttered controller code if overused. Additionally, it may be less intuitive for developers who are accustomed to conventional routing.