MVP vs MVC: When to Use Each?

What are the main differences between MVP and MVC?

MVP (Model-View-Presenter) and MVC (Model-View-Controller) are both architectural patterns used in software development. The main difference lies in how they separate concerns. In MVC, the controller handles user input and updates the model, while the view listens to the model for changes. In MVP, the presenter acts as an intermediary between the view and the model, handling all the presentation logic.

When should I use MVP over MVC?

You might choose MVP when you need a more testable and maintainable codebase, especially in applications with complex user interactions. MVP is often preferred in scenarios where the view is more passive and relies heavily on the presenter for logic.

Can you give me an example of a project that would benefit from using MVC?

Sure! A web application with a dynamic user interface, like an e-commerce site, would benefit from MVC. The controller can manage user requests, the model can handle data interactions, and the view can update dynamically based on user actions.

Are there any downsides to using MVP?

Yes, one downside of MVP is that it can lead to more boilerplate code compared to MVC, as the presenter needs to handle more responsibilities. This can make the initial setup more complex.