What are the differences between NgRx and Akita?

What are the differences between NgRx and Akita?

NgRx and Akita are both state management libraries for Angular, but they have different philosophies. NgRx is based on Redux and emphasizes a unidirectional data flow, while Akita is more flexible and allows for a more straightforward approach to managing state.

Can you explain how NgRx handles state?

NgRx uses a store to manage state, which is immutable. Actions are dispatched to modify the state, and reducers are used to specify how the state changes in response to those actions.

What about Akita? How does it manage state?

Akita uses a store as well, but it allows for mutable state management. It provides a simpler API for managing entities and collections, making it easier to work with complex state.

Which one should I choose for my Angular project?

It depends on your project's needs. If you prefer a more structured approach with strict immutability, NgRx might be better. If you want flexibility and ease of use, Akita could be the way to go.