How do NGRX and Akita compare in terms of performance?

How do NGRX and Akita compare in terms of performance?

Both NGRX and Akita are state management libraries for Angular, but they have different performance characteristics. NGRX uses a Redux pattern which can lead to more boilerplate code, while Akita offers a simpler API and can be more performant in certain scenarios due to its less complex state management.

What are the specific performance metrics I should look at?

You should consider metrics like state update speed, memory usage, and the time taken for components to re-render. Profiling tools can help you measure these metrics in your application.

Can you give examples of when to use each?

Use NGRX when you need a more structured approach with complex state management and side effects. Akita is great for simpler applications or when you want faster development with less boilerplate.

Are there any benchmarks available for comparison?

Yes, there are several benchmarks available online that compare the performance of NGRX and Akita. They typically focus on state update times and memory consumption.