What are the performance differences between immutable libraries?

What are the performance differences between immutable libraries?

Immutable libraries, like Immutable.js and Immer, have different performance characteristics depending on use cases. Immutable.js uses structural sharing, which can be faster for large data sets, while Immer allows for more straightforward syntax but may have overhead.

Can you give me a specific example of when to use each?

Sure! Use Immutable.js when you need to manage large collections of data efficiently, like in a complex state management scenario. Use Immer for simpler state updates in React applications where readability and ease of use are priorities.

What about memory usage? Is one better than the other?

Generally, Immutable.js can be more memory efficient due to its structural sharing, but it can also lead to higher memory usage if not managed properly. Immer, on the other hand, may use more memory during updates but is often easier to work with.

Are there benchmarks available for these libraries?

Yes, there are several benchmarks available online that compare the performance of these libraries in various scenarios. I can help you find some if you'd like!