What are the performance differences between SSR and CSR?

What are the performance differences between SSR and CSR?

SSR (Server-Side Rendering) generally provides faster initial load times and better SEO, while CSR (Client-Side Rendering) offers a more dynamic user experience after the initial load.

Can you explain how SSR improves SEO?

SSR improves SEO by delivering fully rendered HTML to search engines, making it easier for them to index the content compared to CSR, which may require JavaScript execution.

What are the trade-offs of using CSR?

CSR can lead to slower initial load times and may require more resources on the client side, but it allows for smoother interactions and updates without full page reloads.

Which one is better for a large e-commerce site?

For a large e-commerce site, SSR is often preferred for better SEO and faster initial loads, but a hybrid approach can also be effective.

Are there any frameworks that support both SSR and CSR?

Yes, frameworks like Next.js and Nuxt.js support both SSR and CSR, allowing developers to choose the best rendering method for their needs.