What are the differences between Pundit and CancanCan performance?

What are the differences between Pundit and CancanCan performance?

Pundit and CancanCan are both authorization libraries in Ruby on Rails, but they differ in their approach. Pundit uses a policy-based approach, while CancanCan uses a more traditional role-based approach. This can affect performance depending on the complexity of your authorization rules.

Which one is better for large applications?

For large applications, Pundit might be more suitable due to its policy-based structure, which can be easier to manage as the application scales. However, CancanCan can also perform well if your roles and permissions are straightforward.

Can you give examples of when to use each?

Sure! Use Pundit when you have complex authorization rules that require fine-grained control. Use CancanCan when your application has clear roles and permissions that are easier to manage.

What about performance metrics? Are there benchmarks?

Performance can vary based on implementation, but generally, Pundit may have a slight overhead due to its policy checks. Benchmarks can be found in community discussions, but it's best to test both in your specific context.