What are the differences between reactive architecture and microservices?

What are the differences between reactive architecture and microservices?

Reactive architecture focuses on building responsive, resilient, and scalable systems, while microservices is an architectural style that structures an application as a collection of loosely coupled services.

Can you explain how they complement each other?

Certainly! Reactive architecture can enhance microservices by ensuring that each service is responsive and can handle failures gracefully, leading to a more robust system overall.

What are some real-world examples of each?

For reactive architecture, consider systems like Netflix that handle massive user loads. For microservices, look at Amazon, which uses microservices to manage its vast e-commerce platform.

Which one should I choose for my new project?

It depends on your project's requirements. If you need high scalability and responsiveness, consider reactive architecture. If you prefer modularity and independent deployment, microservices might be the way to go.