How do Restic and Borg compare in terms of performance?

How do Restic and Borg compare in terms of performance?

Restic and Borg are both popular backup solutions, but they have different performance characteristics. Restic is known for its speed and efficiency, especially with incremental backups, while Borg is optimized for deduplication and can be faster in scenarios with a lot of duplicate data. Are you looking for specific performance metrics?

Yes, what are the backup speeds for both?

Backup speeds can vary based on the data being backed up and the environment. Generally, Restic can achieve speeds of around 100 MB/s, while Borg can be faster in deduplicating large datasets, sometimes exceeding 200 MB/s. It really depends on your specific use case.

What about restore speeds?

Restore speeds also depend on the data and the method used. Restic typically restores data quickly, often at similar speeds to its backup rates. Borg can be slower due to its deduplication process, but it can still be efficient if you're restoring a lot of duplicate data.

Which one should I choose for a large dataset?

For large datasets with many duplicates, Borg might be the better choice due to its deduplication capabilities. However, if you prioritize speed and ease of use, Restic could be more suitable. It ultimately depends on your specific needs and environment.