Rust: Async-std vs Tokio

What are the main differences between async-std and Tokio in Rust?

Async-std and Tokio are both libraries for asynchronous programming in Rust, but they have different design philosophies. Async-std aims to provide a familiar standard library experience, while Tokio is more focused on performance and scalability.

Which one should I choose for a new project?

It depends on your project's requirements. If you need a simple and straightforward approach, async-std might be better. For high-performance applications, Tokio is often preferred.

Can you give examples of use cases for each?

Sure! Async-std is great for smaller applications or when you want to quickly prototype. Tokio is ideal for building network services, web servers, or any application that requires handling many concurrent tasks efficiently.

Are there any compatibility issues between the two?

Yes, there can be compatibility issues since they use different runtime models. If you mix them, you might face challenges with task scheduling and execution.