How does Rust compare to C++ in terms of safety?

How does Rust compare to C++ in terms of safety?

Rust is designed with safety in mind, using a strict ownership model to prevent data races and null pointer dereferences, while C++ allows more flexibility but can lead to undefined behavior if not managed carefully.

What are some specific safety features in Rust?

Rust includes features like ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes, which help manage memory safely without a garbage collector.

Can you give examples of common safety issues in C++?

Common issues in C++ include buffer overflows, dangling pointers, and memory leaks, often due to manual memory management.

Is it possible to write safe C++ code?

Yes, it's possible by following best practices, using smart pointers, and leveraging modern C++ features, but it requires more discipline than in Rust.