How does Rust's performance compare to C?

How does Rust's performance compare to C?

Rust is designed for safety and concurrency, while C is known for its speed and low-level memory control. Generally, C can be faster due to its mature optimizations, but Rust's performance is often close, especially with its zero-cost abstractions.

What are the trade-offs between using Rust and C?

The main trade-offs include safety vs. control. Rust provides memory safety and prevents data races, which can lead to safer code, while C offers more direct control over hardware and memory, which can be beneficial for performance-critical applications.

Are there specific scenarios where Rust outperforms C?

Yes, in scenarios involving concurrent programming or when safety is a priority, Rust can outperform C by preventing common bugs like buffer overflows and data races.

What about the learning curve for both languages?

C has a simpler syntax and is often easier for beginners, while Rust has a steeper learning curve due to its strict compiler and ownership model, but it pays off in writing safer code.