How do Rust and C++ handle memory management differently?

How do Rust and C++ handle memory management differently?

Rust uses a system of ownership with strict rules to manage memory, while C++ relies on manual memory management.

What are the advantages of Rust's memory management approach?

Rust's approach eliminates common bugs like null pointer dereferencing and memory leaks, enhancing safety.

Can you explain how C++ handles dynamic memory allocation?

C++ uses operators like 'new' and 'delete' for dynamic memory allocation, requiring developers to manage memory manually.

Are there any performance differences between the two languages due to their memory management?

Yes, Rust's memory management can lead to more predictable performance, while C++ may offer more control at the cost of safety.