How do microservices compare to MVC in terms of scalability?

How do microservices compare to MVC in terms of scalability?

Microservices are designed to be independently deployable and scalable, allowing for better resource utilization. MVC, on the other hand, is a design pattern that can be less flexible in scaling since it often involves a monolithic architecture.

What are the advantages of using microservices for scalability?

Microservices allow for horizontal scaling, meaning you can add more instances of a service as needed. They also enable teams to work on different services simultaneously, improving development speed and scalability.

Are there any downsides to using microservices?

Yes, microservices can introduce complexity in terms of service management, inter-service communication, and data consistency. It requires a robust infrastructure to handle these challenges.

Can MVC be made scalable?

Yes, MVC can be made scalable, but it often requires breaking the monolith into smaller components or services, which can lead to a more complex architecture similar to microservices.

Which approach is better for a startup?

It depends on the startup's needs. If rapid scaling and flexibility are priorities, microservices might be better. For simpler applications, MVC could suffice.