How do SVN and Git compare in terms of security?

How do SVN and Git compare in terms of security?

SVN and Git have different security models. SVN uses a centralized model, which can be easier to secure but also a single point of failure. Git, being decentralized, allows for more redundancy but requires careful management of access controls.

What are the specific security features of Git?

Git offers features like cryptographic signing of commits, which ensures the integrity of the code. It also allows for fine-grained access control through SSH keys and can be integrated with various authentication methods.

Are there any known vulnerabilities in SVN?

Yes, SVN has had vulnerabilities in the past, particularly related to its centralized nature. Issues like unauthorized access can arise if proper access controls are not implemented.

Which one is generally considered more secure?

It depends on the use case. Git can be more secure in distributed environments, while SVN might be easier to secure in a controlled, centralized setup.