What are the differences between Sync ORM and Active Record?

What are the differences between Sync ORM and Active Record?

Sync ORM and Active Record are both design patterns for database interaction, but they have key differences. Active Record combines data access and business logic, while Sync ORM separates them, allowing for more flexibility.

Can you give me an example of how each one works?

Sure! In Active Record, a User model might directly handle database operations like saving or finding users. In Sync ORM, you would have a separate repository class that manages database interactions, keeping your business logic in the model.

Which one is better for large applications?

For large applications, Sync ORM is often preferred because it promotes a cleaner separation of concerns, making the codebase easier to manage and test.

Are there any performance differences between them?

Performance can vary based on implementation, but Sync ORM may have an edge in complex queries due to its flexibility in managing data access.