What is the difference between a systematic review and a narrative review?

What is the difference between a systematic review and a narrative review?

A systematic review uses a structured methodology to collect and analyze data from multiple studies, while a narrative review provides a summary of literature without a strict protocol.

Which one is more reliable for evidence-based practice?

Systematic reviews are generally considered more reliable because they follow rigorous methods to minimize bias and provide comprehensive evidence.

Can you give me an example of when to use each type?

Use a systematic review when you need to answer a specific research question with high-quality evidence. A narrative review is useful for exploring a broad topic or providing context.

Are there any limitations to systematic reviews?

Yes, systematic reviews can be limited by the quality of the included studies, publication bias, and the availability of relevant data.

How do I conduct a systematic review?

Conducting a systematic review involves defining a research question, developing a protocol, conducting a comprehensive literature search, selecting studies, extracting data, and synthesizing findings.