What are the cost differences between traditional and serverless architectures?

What are the cost differences between traditional and serverless architectures?

Traditional architectures often involve upfront costs for hardware and maintenance, while serverless can reduce costs by charging only for actual usage.

Can you give me examples of when serverless might be more cost-effective?

Serverless is often more cost-effective for applications with variable workloads, like event-driven apps or APIs with unpredictable traffic.

What about long-term costs? Do traditional setups become cheaper over time?

In some cases, traditional setups can become cheaper over time due to fixed costs, but they require ongoing maintenance and scaling.

Are there any hidden costs in serverless architectures?

Yes, hidden costs can include data transfer fees, cold start latency, and potential vendor lock-in, which can affect overall expenses.