What are the pros and cons of Waterfall and Agile methodologies?

What are the pros and cons of Waterfall and Agile methodologies?

Waterfall is a linear approach, great for projects with clear requirements. Pros include simplicity and structure, while cons involve inflexibility. Agile, on the other hand, is iterative and adaptable, allowing for changes. Its pros are flexibility and customer feedback, but it can lead to scope creep.

Can you give me specific examples of projects that suit each methodology?

Sure! Waterfall is ideal for construction projects where requirements are fixed. Agile works well for software development, where user needs can evolve.

What about the team dynamics in both methodologies?

In Waterfall, teams often work in silos, focusing on their specific phases. Agile promotes collaboration and continuous communication among team members.

Which methodology is more cost-effective?

Agile can be more cost-effective in dynamic environments due to its adaptability, but Waterfall may be cheaper for projects with well-defined requirements.

How do I choose the right methodology for my project?

Consider factors like project size, complexity, and how often requirements might change. If you have clear, unchanging requirements, Waterfall may be best. For evolving projects, Agile is preferable.