What are the differences between the Bridge and Adapter design patterns?

What are the differences between the Bridge and Adapter design patterns?

The Bridge pattern is used to separate an abstraction from its implementation, allowing them to vary independently. The Adapter pattern, on the other hand, is used to allow incompatible interfaces to work together by converting one interface into another.

Can you give me an example of each pattern?

Sure! For the Bridge pattern, consider a remote control that can operate different types of devices (like TVs and radios) without knowing their specifics. For the Adapter pattern, think of a power adapter that allows a device with a specific plug type to connect to a different socket.

When would I use one pattern over the other?

Use the Bridge pattern when you want to decouple an abstraction from its implementation, especially when both can evolve independently. Use the Adapter pattern when you need to integrate two incompatible interfaces.

Are there any common pitfalls to avoid with these patterns?

Yes, with the Bridge pattern, avoid over-complicating the design by creating too many abstractions. With the Adapter pattern, ensure that the adapter does not become too complex, as it can lead to maintenance challenges.