What are the differences in observer roles?

What are the differences in observer roles in research?

Observer roles in research can vary significantly. For instance, a participant observer engages with the subjects, while a non-participant observer remains detached.

Can you explain the impact of these roles on data collection?

Absolutely! Participant observers may gather richer, more nuanced data due to their involvement, but they risk bias. Non-participant observers can maintain objectivity but might miss contextual insights.

Are there specific fields where one role is preferred over the other?

Yes, in qualitative research, participant observation is often favored, while in quantitative studies, non-participant observation is more common to ensure objectivity.

How do these roles affect the interpretation of results?

The observer's role can influence interpretation; participant observers might bring personal biases, while non-participants may overlook important contextual factors.