What are the key differences between consequentialism and deontology?

What are the key differences between consequentialism and deontology?

Consequentialism focuses on the outcomes of actions, while deontology emphasizes the morality of the actions themselves.

Can you give me an example of each?

Sure! A consequentialist might argue that lying is acceptable if it leads to a better outcome, while a deontologist would say lying is inherently wrong, regardless of the consequences.

Which one is considered more ethical?

It depends on the context and individual beliefs. Some argue that consequentialism is more practical, while others value the moral principles of deontology.

Are there any criticisms of both theories?

Yes, consequentialism can be criticized for justifying harmful actions if they lead to good outcomes, while deontology can be seen as too rigid and not considering real-world consequences.